|
|
|
Democratic Nominees: District 6
Pittsburgh City Code requires that City Council Members run for a new four-year term on a staggered schedule, with four members elected at the same time as the Mayor.
In 2013, the even-numbered Council seats are up, with District 6 incumbent R. Daniel Lavelle facing former Mayoral candidate, attorney and businessman Franco “Dok” Harris and Pittsburgh Water and Sewer Authority Safety Manager Tonya Payne, who held the seat prior to her defeat by Lavelle.
Incumbent Lavelle, a former Chief of Staff to State Representative Jake Wheatley, a current candidate for Mayor, has also served as a legislative aide to Sala Udin, who held the District 6 seat until his defeat by Payne in 2005. He was born in the Hill District, attended Pittsburgh Public Schools, and earned a Bachelor of Science Degree from Kent State University. Lavelle also works for his family’s company, Lavelle Real Estate.
Lavelle, who also serves as Chair of City Council’s Committee on Land Use and Economic Development, with a seat on the board of the Urban Redevelopment Authority, says that during his first term, he has brought $67 million worth of development to his neighborhoods, leveraged into $670 million in development.
“We have also worked very diligently to ensure that while we work on redevelopment, the community benefits,” Lavelle says. “We have continued to work to ensure that minority participation requirements for these projects are in compliance with MWDBE participation standards.”
The Councilor also sponsored an amendment to the City Code requiring financial institutions who hold city accounts to commit to reinvestment in city neighborhoods, which passed in April.
Lavelle says that he has worked hard to keep his promise to restore pride and integrity in the district, which covers a widely diverse set of neighborhoods including Perry Hilltop, the Hill District, North Side, Uptown, Downtown and Oakland, and says he has taken great strides in fulfilling his ambition to be sure those communities are once again safe and prosperous.
“I believe we’re doing that,” Lavelle says, “but there’s more to do, and I look forward to serving the district for four more years.”
In addition to the endorsements of the Post-Gazette and the New Pittsburgh Courier, Lavelle has been endorsed by the Allegheny County Central Labor Council. African American Women for Political Change, AFSCME District Council 84, Firefighters Local 1, Service Employees International Union Locals BJ32, 668 and SEIU Healthcare, and Unite Here Local 57.
Tonya Payne, Safety Manager for the Pittsburgh Water and Sewer Authority, prides herself on not being a politician, preferring to consider herself an advocate for her neighbors. She holds an Associate Degree from Community College of Allegheny County in Criminal Justice and Corrections, and a Bachelor of Arts in Criminal Justice and Psychology from Duquesne University.
She represented District 6 on City Council from 2006 until 2010, and says she decided to run when she did not see the district moving forward. She has received the endorsement of the City Democratic Committee, but could not be reached for other comment.
Payne, who serves as a Democratic Committeewoman, says she is running again because she sees a lack of “good leadership.”
“Two major attributes of a good leader are character and integrity,” Payne says, “I spent a lot of time doing community development, for people who came to us because they were in need.”
Franco “Dok” Harris, who has previously run for Mayor of Pittsburgh, says that he has no political ties to any “dynasty,” and could thus be the ideal manager of a city. “I am running to represent our neighbors, not special interests.”
“I have the ability to bring everyone to the table, and that’s been built up over years of negotiations, mentoring, creating small businesses like I help to start in my own legal practice,” Harris says. “I will deliver the best possible service to all my constituents.”
Harris was raised on the North Side of Pittsburgh, and currently resides Downtown. He has a Bachelors Degree in Politics from Princeton University, attained his law degree from the University of Pittsburgh and a Business Degree from Carnegie Mellon University. In addition to his legal practice, Harris also works at Super Bakery, his family’s business which produces fortified baked goods.
“I have really lived all over the district: Born and raised in the North Side, went to school in Oakland, live Downtown and now our company is investing in the Hill,” Harris says. “So I am somebody who’s not just focused on one neighborhood. District 6 is so diverse, with the wealthiest neighborhoods in the city as well as some of the poorest neighborhoods in the country.”
“A lot of people, especially on the North Side, especially seniors, are worried that they’re being left out, losing their homes through gentrification,” Harris says.
“The [residential] population of Downtown has ‘blown up’ over the last decade, but it still doesn’t feel like a neighborhood.” Harris says. “There’s no grocery store Downtown. We need to make Downtown more livable, because it’s the heart of our city, make it so people want to live there as well as go there.”
“We need to use smart development. The lower Hill needs more than lip service, not just MWDBE contracting that subcontracts again” Harris says. “The Hill is the corridor to Downtown, but we have to make sure that the people who live there are included, to make it work for the people who live there.”
“Each and every part of the district has different needs, and I believe I can represent each and every neighborhood the best way.”
Harris has been endorsed by the Fraternal Order of Police Local 1, Planned Parenthood, P2PAC and others.
By Nancy Hart
nancy@urbanmediatoday.com
Twitter: @nhart543
In 2013, the even-numbered Council seats are up, with District 6 incumbent R. Daniel Lavelle facing former Mayoral candidate, attorney and businessman Franco “Dok” Harris and Pittsburgh Water and Sewer Authority Safety Manager Tonya Payne, who held the seat prior to her defeat by Lavelle.
Incumbent Lavelle, a former Chief of Staff to State Representative Jake Wheatley, a current candidate for Mayor, has also served as a legislative aide to Sala Udin, who held the District 6 seat until his defeat by Payne in 2005. He was born in the Hill District, attended Pittsburgh Public Schools, and earned a Bachelor of Science Degree from Kent State University. Lavelle also works for his family’s company, Lavelle Real Estate.
Lavelle, who also serves as Chair of City Council’s Committee on Land Use and Economic Development, with a seat on the board of the Urban Redevelopment Authority, says that during his first term, he has brought $67 million worth of development to his neighborhoods, leveraged into $670 million in development.
“We have also worked very diligently to ensure that while we work on redevelopment, the community benefits,” Lavelle says. “We have continued to work to ensure that minority participation requirements for these projects are in compliance with MWDBE participation standards.”
The Councilor also sponsored an amendment to the City Code requiring financial institutions who hold city accounts to commit to reinvestment in city neighborhoods, which passed in April.
Lavelle says that he has worked hard to keep his promise to restore pride and integrity in the district, which covers a widely diverse set of neighborhoods including Perry Hilltop, the Hill District, North Side, Uptown, Downtown and Oakland, and says he has taken great strides in fulfilling his ambition to be sure those communities are once again safe and prosperous.
“I believe we’re doing that,” Lavelle says, “but there’s more to do, and I look forward to serving the district for four more years.”
In addition to the endorsements of the Post-Gazette and the New Pittsburgh Courier, Lavelle has been endorsed by the Allegheny County Central Labor Council. African American Women for Political Change, AFSCME District Council 84, Firefighters Local 1, Service Employees International Union Locals BJ32, 668 and SEIU Healthcare, and Unite Here Local 57.
Tonya Payne, Safety Manager for the Pittsburgh Water and Sewer Authority, prides herself on not being a politician, preferring to consider herself an advocate for her neighbors. She holds an Associate Degree from Community College of Allegheny County in Criminal Justice and Corrections, and a Bachelor of Arts in Criminal Justice and Psychology from Duquesne University.
She represented District 6 on City Council from 2006 until 2010, and says she decided to run when she did not see the district moving forward. She has received the endorsement of the City Democratic Committee, but could not be reached for other comment.
Payne, who serves as a Democratic Committeewoman, says she is running again because she sees a lack of “good leadership.”
“Two major attributes of a good leader are character and integrity,” Payne says, “I spent a lot of time doing community development, for people who came to us because they were in need.”
Franco “Dok” Harris, who has previously run for Mayor of Pittsburgh, says that he has no political ties to any “dynasty,” and could thus be the ideal manager of a city. “I am running to represent our neighbors, not special interests.”
“I have the ability to bring everyone to the table, and that’s been built up over years of negotiations, mentoring, creating small businesses like I help to start in my own legal practice,” Harris says. “I will deliver the best possible service to all my constituents.”
Harris was raised on the North Side of Pittsburgh, and currently resides Downtown. He has a Bachelors Degree in Politics from Princeton University, attained his law degree from the University of Pittsburgh and a Business Degree from Carnegie Mellon University. In addition to his legal practice, Harris also works at Super Bakery, his family’s business which produces fortified baked goods.
“I have really lived all over the district: Born and raised in the North Side, went to school in Oakland, live Downtown and now our company is investing in the Hill,” Harris says. “So I am somebody who’s not just focused on one neighborhood. District 6 is so diverse, with the wealthiest neighborhoods in the city as well as some of the poorest neighborhoods in the country.”
“A lot of people, especially on the North Side, especially seniors, are worried that they’re being left out, losing their homes through gentrification,” Harris says.
“The [residential] population of Downtown has ‘blown up’ over the last decade, but it still doesn’t feel like a neighborhood.” Harris says. “There’s no grocery store Downtown. We need to make Downtown more livable, because it’s the heart of our city, make it so people want to live there as well as go there.”
“We need to use smart development. The lower Hill needs more than lip service, not just MWDBE contracting that subcontracts again” Harris says. “The Hill is the corridor to Downtown, but we have to make sure that the people who live there are included, to make it work for the people who live there.”
“Each and every part of the district has different needs, and I believe I can represent each and every neighborhood the best way.”
Harris has been endorsed by the Fraternal Order of Police Local 1, Planned Parenthood, P2PAC and others.
By Nancy Hart
nancy@urbanmediatoday.com
Twitter: @nhart543
Franco DOK Harris and Tonya Payne District 6
House bill to have more stringent immigrant controls: aides
(Reuters) - A bipartisan plan brokered in the House of Representatives will be tougher on illegal immigrants living in the United States than a Senate counterpart, congressional aides said on Friday.
But it fails to address the difficult issue of how many low-skilled foreign workers should be allowed into the country.
Late on Thursday, the eight Republican and Democratic House negotiators working on an immigration bill announced that they had successfully wrapped up a four-year effort and had hammered out a tentative deal.
Republican Representative Mario Diaz-Balart of Florida, one of the negotiators, told reporters on Friday that he was "confident" that the deal will get a full airing in the House Judiciary Committee that has oversight of immigration policy.
Many Republican members of that panel are opposed to moving a comprehensive bill and instead want to take smaller steps to further bolster U.S. borders against illegal crossings and to improve access for foreign high-skilled workers.
While the lawmakers themselves refused to discuss details, which will be translated into legislative language over the next week or two, some congressional aides familiar with the plan sketched out bits of the agreement on Friday.
According to those aides, the House measure, as expected, will set a 15-year path to citizenship for the approximately 11 million undocumented residents, many of whom have been in the United States for years and are raising families here.
The Senate bill, which is now being debated in that chamber's Judiciary Committee, sets a 13-year time frame.
Like the Senate bill, those illegal immigrants who are serving in the military or who were brought over the border as children with their parents, would be put on a faster path to citizenship. But details were not available.
The Service Employees International Union said the tentative deal showed that momentum for immigration legislation was building. Eliseo Medina, secretary-treasurer of the 2.1 million-member union, added that it was "the responsibility of the House leadership to ensure this bipartisanship continues."
UNRESOLVED DISPUTE
Congressional aides confirmed that the negotiators failed to agree on one of the most contentious issues in immigration reform efforts: the future flow of workers from abroad that American firms want to hire as construction workers, hotel maids, waiters and for other low-skilled jobs.
Instead, if and when a comprehensive immigration bill reaches the full House, Democrats and Republicans will offer competing amendments to try to resolve the matter, according to aides. Republicans control the House by a narrow majority.
The bill in the Democratic-controlled Senate relies on a low-skilled worker program that was worked out by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the AFL-CIO labor organization.
That deal has been criticized by some business interests as providing too few slots for foreign workers hoping to apply for American construction jobs. Labor unions have been pushing hard for stringent controls, saying a flood of foreign workers would displace domestic job-seekers.
Aides said that the House deal also would be more stringent than the Senate bill by requiring the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to achieve new border security measures before the 11 million undocumented immigrants could begin moving into legal status.
The Senate effort requires DHS to pursue tough border security measures. But the 11 million would be able to move almost immediately to temporary legal status.
However, in at least one area, the House measure might be viewed as more progressive than the Senate bill, according to an aide.
"People will find the family reunification (provision) is better under the House plan than the Senate plan," the aide said. Like the Senate bill, the House deal eliminates an avenue for siblings living abroad to win visas.
But the aide said the House bill will grant more leeway than its Senate counterpart on granting visas to adult offspring of U.S. residents.
One of the last areas of disagreement among the House negotiators had to do with whether newly legalized residents would be able to participate in President Barack Obama's healthcare law.
Republicans want to include a provision specifying that they would have to buy their own health insurance.
It was not yet clear how that dispute was worked out.
(Reporting by Richard Cowan; Editing by Eric Beech)
But it fails to address the difficult issue of how many low-skilled foreign workers should be allowed into the country.
Late on Thursday, the eight Republican and Democratic House negotiators working on an immigration bill announced that they had successfully wrapped up a four-year effort and had hammered out a tentative deal.
Republican Representative Mario Diaz-Balart of Florida, one of the negotiators, told reporters on Friday that he was "confident" that the deal will get a full airing in the House Judiciary Committee that has oversight of immigration policy.
Many Republican members of that panel are opposed to moving a comprehensive bill and instead want to take smaller steps to further bolster U.S. borders against illegal crossings and to improve access for foreign high-skilled workers.
While the lawmakers themselves refused to discuss details, which will be translated into legislative language over the next week or two, some congressional aides familiar with the plan sketched out bits of the agreement on Friday.
According to those aides, the House measure, as expected, will set a 15-year path to citizenship for the approximately 11 million undocumented residents, many of whom have been in the United States for years and are raising families here.
The Senate bill, which is now being debated in that chamber's Judiciary Committee, sets a 13-year time frame.
Like the Senate bill, those illegal immigrants who are serving in the military or who were brought over the border as children with their parents, would be put on a faster path to citizenship. But details were not available.
The Service Employees International Union said the tentative deal showed that momentum for immigration legislation was building. Eliseo Medina, secretary-treasurer of the 2.1 million-member union, added that it was "the responsibility of the House leadership to ensure this bipartisanship continues."
UNRESOLVED DISPUTE
Congressional aides confirmed that the negotiators failed to agree on one of the most contentious issues in immigration reform efforts: the future flow of workers from abroad that American firms want to hire as construction workers, hotel maids, waiters and for other low-skilled jobs.
Instead, if and when a comprehensive immigration bill reaches the full House, Democrats and Republicans will offer competing amendments to try to resolve the matter, according to aides. Republicans control the House by a narrow majority.
The bill in the Democratic-controlled Senate relies on a low-skilled worker program that was worked out by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the AFL-CIO labor organization.
That deal has been criticized by some business interests as providing too few slots for foreign workers hoping to apply for American construction jobs. Labor unions have been pushing hard for stringent controls, saying a flood of foreign workers would displace domestic job-seekers.
Aides said that the House deal also would be more stringent than the Senate bill by requiring the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to achieve new border security measures before the 11 million undocumented immigrants could begin moving into legal status.
The Senate effort requires DHS to pursue tough border security measures. But the 11 million would be able to move almost immediately to temporary legal status.
However, in at least one area, the House measure might be viewed as more progressive than the Senate bill, according to an aide.
"People will find the family reunification (provision) is better under the House plan than the Senate plan," the aide said. Like the Senate bill, the House deal eliminates an avenue for siblings living abroad to win visas.
But the aide said the House bill will grant more leeway than its Senate counterpart on granting visas to adult offspring of U.S. residents.
One of the last areas of disagreement among the House negotiators had to do with whether newly legalized residents would be able to participate in President Barack Obama's healthcare law.
Republicans want to include a provision specifying that they would have to buy their own health insurance.
It was not yet clear how that dispute was worked out.
(Reporting by Richard Cowan; Editing by Eric Beech)
Fitzgerald Submits Legislation to Council
PITTSBURGH – County Executive Rich Fitzgerald submitted three bills to County Council for consideration at its upcoming meeting:
2013 PAVING PLAN
|
Training push fails to halt military sexual assault crisis(Reuters) - Under pressure to fight sexual assault, the U.S. armed forces in recent years rolled out education programs about proper sexual conduct through methods like role playing and video games.
The increase in education has nevertheless failed to prevent what the nation's top general called last week "a crisis" after the Pentagon reported a 37 percent jump in the estimated number of sexual assault cases in 2012. Moreover, the military suffered deep embarrassment when personnel who worked on preventing sexual assaults were themselves accused of sex crimes this month. On Friday, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel gave top brass a week to come up with a plan for discussing the problem with all troops and ensuring proper training and credentials for those who deal with new recruits and sexual assault victims. Education campaigns teach service members basics like how to make sure the other party is a willing participant in intimate contact, or how to step in as a bystander if an alcohol-fueled situation looks like it could lead to inappropriate conduct. The Army is in the fifth year of its "I Am Strong" sexual assault prevention campaign, under which all new soldiers are drilled on a set of 10 "sex rules." All members of the Air Force are required each year to have one hour of face-to-face sexual assault prevention training from a sexual assault response coordinator. While all the military services have programs on avoiding sexual assault, critics say training may never be enough to do away with the problem. What is needed, says former Marine Captain Anu Bhagwati, is a shake up in the military judicial system. "The military cannot train its way out of this problem," said Bhagwati, who is now executive director of the Service Women's Action Network, which campaigns for women's issues in the armed forces. She urges the military to take prosecution of sexual assault cases away from the chain of command, making it easier for victims to seek justice, an idea echoed in a Senate bill last week. "I think even today the training is not meaningful, certainly not in a significant way that causes behavior change," said Bhagwati, who helped implement sexual assault prevention training before she left the military in 2004. General Mark Welsh, the Air Force chief of staff, said it will take time and diligence to see progress from sexual assault prevention training. "The experts tell me we have to be careful ... because sometimes programs that are successful in this area will take a long time to show results," he told reporters at the Pentagon. "This is not going to be a rapid fix," Welsh said. "It's got to be a constant attention to detail." 'BEHEMOTH ORGANIZATIONS' While more than half the victims of sexual assault in the military are men, women in the services are still more likely to be accosted sexually. There are nearly 205,000 women in the active duty military, nearly 15 percent of the total, and women will be integrated in frontline combat roles by 2016. General Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said last week the military is losing the confidence of women members because of the sexual assault "crisis." Changing the culture in an armed forces of 1.4 million people is an enormous challenge. "These are behemoth organizations. They are enormous. They have attempted to deal with the very difficult problem of sexual assault," said Anne Munch, a former prosecutor who has worked as a consultant on sexual assault issues with the military for more than a decade. "You have to attack the problem in a lot of different ways, and there's no one answer and there's no silver bullet." The Army has a live, interactive program called "Sex Signals" in which soldiers watch actors role play dating scenarios on stage and discuss whether the participants correctly understand how their actions are viewed. The Army also makes use of a video game called "Team-Bound" in which players witness a potential sexual harassment incident as it unfolds. Soldiers and officers receive sexual assault prevention training at all levels. New recruits are drilled on a set of 10 rules, from "sexual assault is a crime" and "no always means no" to "stop sexual hazing, bullying and assault" and "be a leader, not a passive bystander." To some, the training can come off as half-hearted. The Protect Our Defenders victims' advocacy group said an Air Force officer told them that a course he took consisted of being given two brochures to read and being told to sign a paper saying he had come to the class. The treatment of victims often leaves a lot to be desired, despite efforts to help those who have experienced sexual assault, said the Air Force's Welsh. One story that Welsh says hit him "like a ton of bricks" was that of a service member who had been raped in another country. When she went to a base hospital for testing, a technician came out to the waiting room and said in a loud voice, "OK, now who was the sexual assault victim?" The Air Force started a program in January in which victims are assigned an attorney to guide them through the process and keep them from having to go over their testimony repeatedly. Welsh said early statistics on the victims' counsel program show the percentage of people willing to proceed with prosecutions is up substantially. Among those who initially report their cases only on condition it not be pursued as a criminal matter, only about 13 percent shift and agree to prosecute. But in a group of 300 people with special victims' counsels, 55 percent of those who did not want to pursue the case criminally have shifted and agreed to prosecute, Welsh said. (Additional reporting by Phil Stewart; Editing by Alistair Bell, Mary Milliken and Jackie Frank) |

